HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26057 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anupam Anand, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Ashutosh Krishna, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rajesh Yadav, counsel for the informant. Perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 226 of 2025, under Section 105 B.N.S., Police Station- Vrindawan, District- Mathura during pendency of the trial. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is the proprietor of the firm namely, M/s Krishna Machinery Traders. The said firm was granted contract for laying down sewer lines. The death of the son of the informant was accidental in nature and not by any deliberate act. The brother of the applicant also died in the alleged incident. The applicant is in jail since 7.6.2025 having no criminal history. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. and counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this Court prima facie finds that at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to establish that the applicant had any intent to cause the death of the son of the informant. Further the applicant has presently remained confined for more Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajesh Yadav Monu Alias Mohan Jadaun .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) than four months and there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witness, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. 6. Let the applicant, Monu @ Mohan Jadaun involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that: i. the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; ii. the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness; iii. the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. October 28, 2025 S.S. BAIL No. 26057 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad