S.M.Sadhiq Ali, v. S.M.Shamsudeen (Died), S.M.Mubarak Ali (Died), (1) S.M.Liakath Ali,
CMP(MD)/2440/2025 · 2025-11-11
C V Karthikeyan, R Vijayakumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172452 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172452 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP(MD) NO. 2440 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CMP(MD) NO. 2440 of 2025 in AS(MD) No.91 of 2020
1. S.M.Sadhiq Ali, S/o.S.M.Sait No.70 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli.
2. S.M.BILAL S/o.S.M.Sait No.70 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. S.M.Shamsudeen (Died), S.M.Mubarak Ali (Died), (1) S.M.Liakath Ali, M/s.S.M.Sait No.43 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli.
2. S.M.Iqbal S/o.S.M.Sait No.68 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli.
3. S.M.Nowsath Ali S/o.S.M.Sait Weavers Colony Vadivel Nagar Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4. Meharunnissa W/o.Mubarak Ali No.76 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli.
5. Makkabi D/o.Mubarak Ali No.76 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli.
6. Mohamed Ashraf Ali D/o.Mubarak Ali No.76 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli.
7. Mohamed Azharudeen S/o.Mubarak Ali No.76 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli. 8.Regina W/o. S.M. Liakath ali No. 43 Pangali Street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli.
9. l. fathima D/o. S.M. Liakath ali No. 43 Pangali street Woraiyur Tiruchirappali.
10. l. ibrahim S/o. S.M. Liakath Ali No. 43 Pangali street Woraiyur Tiruchirappalli. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Murugan for R1 and R3 Mr.R.Jothiramalingam for R2 to R7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Prayer:To bring on record the proposed parties/ proposed respondents 8 to 10 as the legal heirs of deceased 1st respondent and rank them as respondents 8 to 10. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) This petition has been filed to bring on record the proposed respondents 8 to 10 as the legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent, who died on 26.11.2024.
2. It had been contended in the affidavit that the right to prosecute the appeal survives to the proposed respondents also.
3. We had directed notice to the said respondents and the names are printed in the cause list. There has been no appearance.
4. Petition stands allowed. Registry may carry out necessary amendment in the cause title reflecting the death of the first respondent and bringing on record his legal heirs as respondents 8 to 10. Call the matter again on 10.12.2025.
(C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J.) (R.VIJAYAKUMAR J.) 11-11-2025 RR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis