Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172450 (ALL)

AJAY ALIAS TITU v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/26525/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26525 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Jai Prakash Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Roshan Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed to release the applicant on bail in case crime No. 10 of 2025, under Section 109(1), 117(2), 352 B.N.S., P.S. Aunchha, District Mainpuri. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated, though he did not commit any offence. It is further submitted that all the injuries are false. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that specific allegation has been made against the applicant and the injured received one grievous head injury i.e. comminuted depressed fracture of left parietal bone, therefore, no case for interference is made out. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account that specific allegation has been made against the applicant for causing comminuted depressed fracture on parietal bone of the victim which is not only grievous but also dangerous to life, this Court does not find any good ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. October 28, 2025 Vandana Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jai Prakash Prasad, Rakesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Ajay Alias Titu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad