Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:11588 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PSS/ 2 2 6 4 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Anil Anthwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand / respondents.
3. Petitioner claims to have been appointed as Assistant Teacher in an unaided school in the year 2005. The
order of approval passed by Additional District Education Officer, Basic, Dehradun dated 31.03.2008 is on record as Annexure-4 to the writ petition.
4. Petitioner contends that her services have not been regularised and she is still getting salary from the management, while, the concerned school has been included in grant-in-aid list. Relief sought in the writ petition are as follows: -
“i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing/ commanding the respondent department to forthwith adjust/ regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher (Primary) in Swami Ramtirth Girls High School, Rajpur, Dehradun and release her salary from State fund with all service consequential benefits from the date when the said institution of the petitioner comes within the purview of grant-in- aid.
ii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/ directing the respondents to release the arrears of salary of the petitioner alongwith the interest of 18% per annum in favor of the petitioner.”
2025:UHC:11588
5. Learned State Counsel submits that petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus and she has also made a representation, therefore, decision on representation shall be taken by the competent authority as early as possible.
6.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner be permitted to make fresh representation, highlighting her grievances.
7. The writ petition is, accordingly,
disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make fresh representation to the competent authority, within two weeks from today. If petitioner makes such representation within the stipulated time, the same shall be decided, as per law, within four months thereafter.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
24.12.2025 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4 e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D 095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.12.24 16:21:10 +05'30'