( 2025:JHHC:17391 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5239 of 2025 ------ Md Idrish @ Idrish Ansari, aged about 32 years, S/o-Paro Miyan @ Abdul Karim, R/o Village-Nagadari, P.O.-Baskupi, P.S.-Karon, District-Deoghar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Karon P.S. Case No.23 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 127 (2), 132, 121 (1), 121 (2), 262, 263, 109, 351 (3) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, voluntarily used criminal force, assaulted and caused hurt to the public servants in discharge of their duty; who went to investigate a cyber-crime and attempted to commit their murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and general and omnibus in nature. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-22 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because of village politics. It is next submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that two co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 19.06.2025 passed in B.A. No.4840 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.04.2025 as is evident from para-22 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Madhupur in connection with Karon P.S. Case No.23 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/