Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17243 (AP)

Sadunupalli Ramu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/4946/2025 · 2025-05-21

K Suresh Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

EEE=E IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMA ~I THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MA TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH R CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4946 OF 2025 / S* '-€f*%#% Between : Sadunupalli Ramu, S/o. Eswara Rao, Agedl,33 years, Occ: Wo`rking in Indian Army, R/o. Gangupeta Village in Chinna Sana Panchayat, Kotabommali Mandal; SrI'kakulam District. Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. Respondent ..,' Petition under section 482 of BNSS., is fI-led Praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the petition, the HI'gh Court may be pI6ased to direct the station House Officer, Kotabommali Police Station, Srikakulam District to release the petitioner/accused on bail in the event of his arrest in connectl'on with cr. No.105/2025 of Kotabommali Police Station, Srikakulam District. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate for the petitl'oner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent; The Court made the following: ., /,- Ez. / { APHCO10234592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH r. AT AMARAVATI (Special OrI-ginaI Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIrV]INAL PETITION NO: 4946/2025 AND Betwee n : Sadunupalli Ramu, The State Of Andhra Pradesh [3239] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following order: The sole accused in Crime No.105 of 2025 of Kotabommali Police Station, Srikakulam District has filed the present application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking for a pre-arrest baI-I. 2. The said crime was registered for the offence under section 109(1) ofBNS. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the c/efacfo complainant and the petitioner are close relatives and the petitioner is working in the Indian \_-_-- \ _.I 2 KSR, J Crl.P.No.4946 of 2025 Army. The defacfo complainant is eking out his livelihood by doing real estate business. The elder son of the defacfo complainant is also working in the Indian Army. As the defacfo complainant is earning good money, the petitioner developed grudge against the defacfo complainant. While so, on 03.04.2025, at about 7.00 hrs, the petitioner went to the house of the c/efacfo complainant and bet him with knife on the palm and thigh of the c/efacfo complainant. When the neighbours gathered there, the accused went away. Thereafter, the defacfo complainant went to a government hospital and took treatment. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is working in the Indian Army and the injuries received by the defacfo complainant are on the right palm and thigh. As such the ingredients of Section 109(1 ) of BNS are not attracted. 5. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor contended that the defacfo complainant received severe injuries on the right palm and thigh. 6. Be that as it may. As the injuries on the c/efacfo complainant were not on vital parts, this Court is inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner with certain directions: i. The petitioner/accused is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Kotabommali Police Station, on or before 05.06.2025. i-_. -JJ C--:,, 3 KSR, J Crl.P-No.4946 of 2025 ii. Upon such surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of Station House Officer concerned; iii. After release, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the Investigating Officer; and lV. The petitioner/accused is directed to appear before the Investigating officer as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. sD/-K.J.RAJA BABU //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Station House Officer, Kotabommali Police Station, Srikakulam District. 2. OneCCto Sri. D PURNACHANDRAREDDY,Advocate[OPUC] 7f 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.Z Amaravati. [OUT] 4. One spare COPY JSS /-/ \ / HIGH COURT KSR, J DATED : 22/05/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.4946 of 2025 ALLOWED Fthgr g&#if¥