SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10989 C482 No.29 of 2024 With (Compounding Appl. No.01 of 2024) Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the Applicants. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present Application has been filed by the Applicants under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. alongwith compounding application paper no.32, which is supported with the affidavits of applicants and respondent nos.3, 4 & 5 wherein parties have annexed their signatures. 4. By means of this C482 application, applicants have sought quashing of the FIR No.315 of 2013, charge sheet dated 30.06.2014, summoning/cognizance order dated 30.06.2014 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.878 of 2016 State vs. Rishipal and others for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 308 & 504 of IPC registered at Police Station Laksar District Haridwar pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Laksar, District Haridwar. 5. Applicant nos.1, 2 & 3 as well as respondent nos.3, 4 & 5 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by their respective counsels. Applicant no.4-Mithun is not present in the Court. 6. Father of the applicant no.4 i.e. applicant no.3-Imrat makes a submission that his son applicant no.4 is attending his mother, who is sick and thus he could not come to the court for compounding application. 7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 8. After interacting with the parties the compounding application seems to be sufficient to allow subject to filing an affidavit on behalf of Applicant no.4-Mithun by applicant no.3, his father, endorsed by learned counsel. 9. Learned State counsel has opposed the compounding application. 10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 11. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them. 12. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.878 of 2016 State vs. Rishipal and others for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 308 & 504 of IPC pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Laksar, District Haridwar are hereby quashed. 13. Accordingly instant C482 application stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 10.12.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.12.11 10:29:44 +05'30'