1 APHC010234972019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10547/2019 Between: M.manohar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of 3rd and 4th respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 23.05.2019 which is made for re-enquiring into the allegations leveled against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice, and to pass such other order or orders……” 2 2. Sri Syed Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, appearing for the respondents, is in attendance. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.03.2025 ARR 3 150 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10547/2019 Dt.06.03.2025 ARR