MOHAMMAD AYUB KHAN S/O SHRI GULAM HUSSAIN KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7475/2025 · 2025-07-30
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17239 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17239 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28823] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7475/2025 Mohammad Ayub Khan S/o Shri Gulam Hussain Khan, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of 460, Sanjay Nagar, Shashtri Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, De- partment Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secre- tariat, Jaipur.,
2. Commissioner, (Admn.), Commercial Tax Department, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur.
3. Deputy Commissioner (Admn.), Commercial Tax Depart- ment , Zone-1, Jhalana Doongari, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shashi Bala Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 30/07/2025 Although, in the writ petition, a prayer is made to quash the adverse entry awarded to the petitioner and to consider his candidature for promotion to the post of “Administrative Officer”; but, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contended if the respondents are directed to decide his representation dated 21.01.2025, expeditiously. In view of the nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.:
[2025:RJ-JP:28823] (2 of 2) [CW-7475/2025] SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is
disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1.The respondents are directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation dated 21.01.2025 filed by the petitioner within a period of twelve from the date of intimation of this order in accordance with law with communication of the decision to him. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/65