SRI.JAGATH GURU RAGHAVENDRA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (R) v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
WP/4549/2020 · 2025-01-10
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17238 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17238 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1046 WP No. 4549 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4549 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. JAGATH GURU RAGHAVENDRA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (R), REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.1, NAIDU LAYOUT, JARAGANAHALLI, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 078.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SECRETARY.
DODDAMANI RAJESHWARI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRI.K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BENGALURU CITY, AT INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
M/S. SHELL INDIA MARKETS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT CAMPUS 4A, RMZ MILLENNIA BUSINESS PARK, NO.143 DR. M.G.R.ROAD, KANDANCHAVADY, PERUNGUDI, CHENNAI - 600 096 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1;
SRI. NITHIN.R., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1046 WP No. 4549 of 2020
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition was filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of January
2025. The petition is pending from five years. As already noted above, though the matter called twice, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 32.