Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172338 (ALL)

KARAM LAL v. GAIL (INDIA) LTD. AND 3 OTHERS

A227/12791/2025 · 2025-10-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12791 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue an order or direction, directing to the court of Additional Sessions Judge/ F.T.C. Court no.2 Azamgarh to decide the misc. case no. 113 of 2018 (Ansar Ahmad Versus Gail India Ltd. and others) within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2018, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge/ F.T.C. Court no.2 Azamgarh to decide the above- mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. October 27, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Moti Lal Chauhan, Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Karam Lal .....Petitioner(s) Gail (India) Ltd. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad