MOHD. YASHEEN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/24518/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172337 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172337 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 24518 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State.
2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 22.10.2024 along with cognizance/summoning
order dated 24.01.2025 and entire proceeding of Case No.84 of 2025 (State Vs. Mohd. Akhtar and others), arising out of Case Crime No.277 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 110, 117(2), P.S. Nawabganj, District Prayagraj, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet along with injury report, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet and entire proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Bhatt, Kripa Shanker Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Yasheen And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally
disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. October 29, 2025 Vivek Kr. NA528 No. 24518 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad