SMT. REENA DEVI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/37310/2025 · 2025-10-29
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37310 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Deo Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No. 4, the Naib Tehsildar, Gauri Bazar, Tehsil and District Deoria, to decide the restoration application dated 19.6.2025 bearing Case No. RST 16975 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202505200116975) [Arvind Vs. Smt. Reena and Others], under Section 209H of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. The order sheet of the case, a copy whereof has also been appended to the writ petition indicates that after filing of the restoration application, although several dates have been fixed, but the matter is being adjourned for some reason or the other. It is submitted that the delay in disposal of the restoration application as well as the proceedings, are causing undue hardship to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners, by way of the present petition, has sought the proceedings to be concluded expeditiously. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Respondent(s) has no objection if the proceedings are expedited. Having regard to the aforementioned facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court concerned would make an Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bipin Kumar Rao, Deo Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Reena Devi And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
endeavor to decide the restoration application and also the case itself, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the instant order, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 30, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 37310 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad