Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:11077-DB
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL
HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
1 1 TH DECEMBER, 2 0 2 5
W RI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) No. 1 04 1 OF 2 0 2 5
Tarunya Rawat.
…Petitioner Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner.
: Ms. Disha Nanda and Mr. Priyanshu Gairola, learned counsels.
JUDGMENT : (per Sr i G. Nar en d ar , C.J.)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent developments, the instant Writ Petition has rendered infructuous. It is, therefore, prayed that the instant Writ Petition be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
2.
Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
3.
The instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ G. NARENDAR, C.J.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 11th December, 2025 Rahul
1
RAHUL PRAJAPATI Digitally signed by RAHUL PRAJAPATI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=aa4fa3bee6691397758b14516ed3 e66e61bf4c848741983ed8c39e4145cf1dab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=303B55CC3063D34AC45BF8 A192FCAD15C390A1AAD7B39857D2540AE 4C28A4898, cn=RAHUL PRAJAPATI Date: 2025.12.17 15:40:50 +05'30'