Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1723 (UTT)

AMARJEET SINGH POONIA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/88/2024 · 2025-06-04

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.88 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for respondent no.3. Restoration application (MCRC No.7 of 2025) 4. The restoration application is filed by the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdrawn the restoration application with liberty to file fresh with better particulars. 6. Accordingly restoration application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 10.06.2025 SK