Bikram Wangkheimayum v. State of Manipur and 4 Others
WP(C)/612/2025 · 2025-08-11
A Guneshwar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1723 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1723 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Suppl. (1) Item no. 8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
W.P. (C) No. 612 of 2025
Bikram Wangkheimayum … Petitioner - Versus –
State of Manipur and 4 Ors. … Respondents
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
ORDER 12.08.2025
[1] Heard Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar, learned sr. counsel assisted by Ms. Kh. Maria, learned counsel for the petitioner. [2] Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned GA on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and Mr. S. Kaminikumar, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 5. [3] By the present writ petition, the petitioner is praying for release of a sum of Rs. 12,95,158/- (Rupees twelve lakhs ninety five thousand one hundred fifty eight) for setting up of Power Loom Unit at Lamboikhongnangkhong, Imphal West and the bill is still pending. [4] At this stage, the learned sr. counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of by giving a liberty to submit a fresh representation to the respondents for claiming the undisputed bill. And further the respondent are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner and make a proper verification regarding the claim of the petitioner. [5] After proper verification, if the claim of the petitioner is found to be genuine a speaking order shall be passed. The whole exercise shall be completed within a period of 3(three) months. OINAM THOIB A MEITEI Digitally signed by OINAM THOIBA MEITEI Date: 2025.08.14 11:48:24 +05'30'
[6] The learned counsel for the respondents are agreeable to the proposal for disposing of the writ petition by passing innocuous order. [7] It is made clear that this Court doesn’t express any opinion on the merit of the case. [8] With these observations, the present W.P. (C) No. 612 of 2025 is
disposed of.
JUDGE
Thoiba