ARPIT SINGH v. SHRI SURENDRA TIWARI, SECRETARY BASIC EDUCATION PARISHAD
CAPL/2899/2024 · 2025-11-02
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172296 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172296 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2899 of 2024 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Sri Yatindra, learned counsel for the opposite party states that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and now, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application; therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has also admitted the compliance of the order passed by this Court.
3. Accordingly, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. November 3, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Arpit Singh .....Applicant(s) Shri Surendra Tiwari, Secretary Basic Education Parishad .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad