ANKUR MALIK ALIAS CHOTU v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/16322/2018 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16322 of 2018 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. List revised. Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 are not present. On the previous date, learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file rejoinder affidavit, but today, none has appeared on behalf of the applicant and opposite no. 2. Hence, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
October 29, 2025 Brijesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shambhavi Nandan, Shiv Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jagdish Prasad Mishra (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Ankur Malik Alias Chotu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad