Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17225 (CHH)

ASHOK KUMAR DILLIWAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2502/2025 · 2025-04-15

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2025:CGHC:17118 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2502 of 2025 1 - Ashok Kumar Dilliwar S/o Late Kuber Singh Dilliwar Aged About 58 Years Presently Working As Training Officer, Trade - Electrician, Industrial Training Institute, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Employment And Training, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Principal Government Industrial Training Institute, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, Dy.A.G. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 15/04/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.04.15 18:21:41 +0530 2 / 3 transfer order dated 20/03/2025 Annexure P-1, by which, the petitioner has been transferred from Government Industrial Training Institute, Durg to Government Industrial Training Institute, Ramchandrapur, District:Balrampur-Ramanujganj. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the event of the transfer of the petitioner from the present place of posting, the family of the petitioner will destabilize, as a five years old daughter is studying in District Durg and his wife is also a government employee posted in Durg. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that to redress the grievance of the employees who have been transferred by the State, a committee has been constituted on 03.03.2025 and if the petitioner will approach the committee, said committee shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with the policy of the State Government and grievance if any raised by the petitioner, the same shall be redressed within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Looking to the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the wife of the petitioner is an government employee and posted in Durg, the petitioner shall approach the Committee constituted by the State Government and submit a representation within a period of 10 days. If the petitioner will file any such representation before the committee, the committee is directed to consider the same and pass necessary order in accordance with the policy of the State Government by considering the grievance of 3 / 3 the petitioner within a further period of 20 days. Till then, for the period of 30 days, the order impugned dated 20/03/2025 Annexure P-1 shall remain stayed. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the committee about the order passed by this Court. SD/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Amardeep