SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2013:UHC:7028 (Compounding Appl. No.3163 o 2025) In CRLA No.157 of 2013 With (Compounding Appl. No.468 of 2025) In CRLA No.173 of 2013 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. M.S. Pal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Ambreen Bano, learned counsel for the Appellants. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Both the criminal appeals have been filed by the Appellants alongwith compounding applications, same are supported with the affidavits of appellant, complainant and injured wherein parties have annexed their signatures. 5. By means of both criminal appeals, appellant has sought quashing of the judgment and order dated 22.03.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in S.T. No.317 of 2010 (Crime No.385 of 2010) State vs. Deepak Jain and Another under Sections 30 and 27 of Arms Act, registered at P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 6. Appellant, complainant as well as injured are present in the Court. Appellant-Jai Chand Jain in CRLA No.157 of 2013 is present through V.C. They are duly identified by their respective counsels. 7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 8. Learned State counsel has opposed the compounding application. 9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 10. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them. 11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. Entire proceedings in both appeals arising out of S.T. No.317 of 2010 (Crime No.385 of 2010) State vs. Deepak Jain and Another under Sections 30 and 27 of Arms Act, registered at P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar are hereby quashed. 12. Accordingly, both the criminal appeals stand disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 10.12.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.12.11 10:30:55 +05'30'