Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172233 (ALL)

SANJAY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/40063/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40063 of 2025 Court No. - 81 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appears for the applicant and submits that the victim is not appearing before the court for deposition despite the charge being framed in the year 2023 and issuance of bailable warrants against her. Hence, he seeks intervention of this Court to quash the charge-sheet and proceedings as the opposite party no.2 was a consenting party. 2. Learned A.G.A. appears for the State. 3. There is no point in issuing notice to opposite party no.2. 4. Considering that the charge has already been framed against the accused- applicant in the year 2023, though his discharge application was rejected on 14.09.2022, there is no merit in the application. 5. The application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. is dismissed. 6. However, learned trial court may issue adequate processes for procuring the presence of opposite party no.2 (victim) for her deposition in Sessions Trial No.1344 of 2021 (State Versus Sanjay) arising out of Case Crime No.355 of 2021 under Sections 376, 328 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Muzaffar Nagar. October 29, 2025 MN/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Avnish Saxena,J.) Sanjay .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHENDRA NATH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad