Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17223 (RAJ)

KALURAM JANGID v. STATE P H E D AND ORS

CW/9766/2012 · 2025-08-04

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29793] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9766/2012 1. Kaluram Jangid S/o Shri Radhakishan, aged about 49 years, R/o Village Malikpur, Tehsil - Malpura, Distt. Tonk. 2. Ram Kunwar S/o Shri Devilal Gurjar, age about 28 years, R/o Village Loharvada, Tehsil - Pipalu, District - Tonk. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Engineering Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Assistant Engineer Rural, Public Health And Engineering Department, Sub Division Tonk. 4. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Malikpur, Tehsil - Malpura, District Tonk. 5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Loharvada, Tehsil - Pipalu, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghunandan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat with Mr. Prateek Saxena for Mr. K.P. Mathur, AAG Ms. Supriya Rana for Ms. Minakshi Jain, GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 04/08/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents has raised a preliminary objection as to maintainability of the writ petition in view of the involvement of the disputed questions of facts. [2025:RJ-JP:29793] (2 of 2) [CW-9766/2012] Confronted with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law for redressal of their grievance(s). The prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/64