HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13107 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and direct the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Shamli, to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) under order 39 rule 1 & 2 of the C.P.C. in suit no. 165 of 2021 (Mohit and others Vs. Smt. Rukmesh and another)." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2021 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.), Shamli to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 30, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mohit And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Rukmesh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad