IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.661 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Vishal Sharma …….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Motta, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that on account of passing of order dated 26.06.2025, present petition has been rendered infructuous and same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to the order passed in purported compliance of the judgment alleged to have been violated, if required and desired. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 17,2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?