Sayarabee wo Husen Sayed v. The state of Maharashtra
CP/433/2025 · 2025-07-25
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17220 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17220 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 917- C. P. No. 433-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 433 OF 2025 IN WP/8788/2023 SAYARABEE WO HUSEN SAYED VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ganpat Niranjan Chincholkar, AGP for Respondent/State: Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh ….
CORAM :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 25th JULY 2025
ORDER:-
1. By filing affidavit-in-reply of respondent No.2, the Government has stated that order is complied with.
2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner confirms the said fact.
3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner makes a grievance that concerned officer has not given certified copy. The officer shall issue certified copy within two weeks from today.
4. In view of compliance of the order, the contempt petition is
disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ) JUDGE JUDGE Y.S. Kulkarni