Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17219 (KAR)

SRI DAYALU R v. THE SENIOR MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER SRI VASHISA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LIMITED

WP/4847/2021 · 2025-01-20

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2212 WP No. 4847 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4847 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI DAYALU R, S/O LATE RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, AGE ABOUT 76 YEARS, RESIDING AT 362/04, 9TH J MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHARATHKUMAR SHETTY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE SENIOR MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER SRI VASHISA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LIMITED, SITUATED AT NO.1, 1ST FLOOR, ADITYA BUILDING, SRIRAMANJEANEYA ROAD, HANUMANTHANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 019. 2. MR.P.RAM PRASAD, S/O A H PADMANABHAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.1300, 6TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE 2ND PHASE, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 072. …RESPONDENTS (SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2212 WP No. 4847 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 16.01.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 20.01.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 21