M/S.CHANDRAPPA VENKATESH v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST)(FAC)
WP/41844/2025 · 2025-11-04
C Saravanan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172182 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172182 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.41844 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.46879 & 46881 of 2025 M/s.Chandrappa Venkatesh Rep:by its Proprietor C.Venkatesh D No.2/16, Nehru Nagar 1 st Main Road, Near Sub-Collector Bungalow Denkanikottai Road, Hosur Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu 635 109. ...Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Hosur (South)-III Assessment Circle Integrated Commercial Tax Building Ground Floor, Seetharam Medu Old Bus Stand, Hosur – 635 109. ...Respondent Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the 1/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 records of the assessment proceedings in GSTIN: 33ACGPV4424K2ZD/ 2019-2020 dated 29.07.2024 for the year 2019-20 and to quash this impugned order passed by the respondent and direct the respondent to pass fresh orders as per law as the total output turnover for the year 2019- 20 is only Rs.20,70,673 which is below the threshold limit for the levy of taxes under CGST and SGST Acts. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Baktha Siromoni For Respondent : Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government Pleader
ORDER Mr.C.Harasharaj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent.
2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and 2/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent, this Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned
order dated 29.07.2024, passed by the Tax period 2019-2020 which was preceded by a notice in DRC-01 dated 17.10.2023/05.04.2024 followed by two reminders on 19.02.2024 & 02.07.2024. However, the petitioner is failed to respond to the same and thus suffered the impugned order dated
29.07.2024. 4. It is a specific case that the petitioner's debt is within the exempted turn over and therefore, the petitioner is neither liable to pay tax nor liable to file return. Therefore, impugned order is liable to be quashed. That apart, the petitioner is also given a representation on
29.08.2025. 3/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be given an opportunity to file an appeal. 6. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the writ petition is scopeless and time barred and therefore, liable to be dismissed on account of laches. 7. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Orders has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on
29.09.2025. 8. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and 4/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 cases have been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case. 9. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not replied to the notice in DRC-01 dated 17.10.2023, following the consistent view taken under similar circumstances, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass fresh orders on merits, subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner replied within such time, the respondent shall pass fresh orders on merits as expeditiously as possible. 5/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025
10.
Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 17.10.2023/05.04.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 29.07.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 05.04.2024. 11. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, if any, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically raised/vacated. 12. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in 6/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 13. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. 14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 04.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Case Citation : Yes/No dna 7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Hosur (South)-III Assessment Circle Integrated Commercial Tax Building Ground Floor, Seetharam Medu Old Bus Stand, Hosur – 635 109. 8/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 C.SARAVANAN
, J.
dna W.P.No.41844 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.46879 & 46881 of 2025 9/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41844 of 2025 04.11.2025 10/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis