[2025:JHHC:17606] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5299 of 2025 ------ Rahul Singh @ Rahul Bacha, aged about 29 years, son of Aadesh Singh, resident of Vishkarma Colony, Near Darbhanga Dairy, P.O. & P.S.- Olidih, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Supriya Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.241 of 2024 arising out of Mango P.S. Case No.33 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.494 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed murder of Raja Kumar. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Learned counsel for the petitioner next draws attention of this Court towards the deposition of the PW-1 Aman Singh kept in Annexure-2 at page No.21-22 of the brief, who, as per the case of the prosecution, is the eye-witness of the occurrence and submits that he did not identify the petitioner in the court and stated that he does not know the petitioner and he has been declared hostile; similarly, PW-2 has also not supported the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.05.2024 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.08.2024 passed in B.A. No.6746 of 2024. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Jamshedpur in connection with S.T. Case No.241 of 2024 arising out of Mango P.S. Case No.33 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.494 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/