HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 3374 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Ms.Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arvind Mishra, learned counsel for the revenue. 2. The present writ petition has been filed against the adjudication order dated 28.03.2025. 3. By a separate order passed today in Writ Tax 3346 of 2025 (M/s Kashi Traders Vs. State of U.P. and another) in near similar facts, interference claimed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been declined. 4. Here too, relief has been claimed on the strength of appeal orders passed in other proceedings. Those orders may not have attained finality. For the reason contained in the order passed in Writ Tax No.3346 of 2025, interference claimed in the present writ petition is declined. However, keeping in mind the further fact the writ petition has remained pending since July 2025, we further provide subject to the petitioner filing statutory appeal against the impugned order within a period of three weeks from today, the same may be entertained and dealt with and decided on its own merit by treating the appeal to have been filed within limitation and without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. October 27, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pooja Talwar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) M/S Accumen Laminators Llp .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad