Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172148 (ALL)

VIRENDRA SINGH v. SMT. SHADHNA SRIVASTAVA, DIRECTOR, INTERNAL ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT, GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CAPL/3862/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3862 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Compliance affidavits filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 today in Court, which are taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 2. Learned Standing Counsel representing opposite party nos.1 and 2 states that order passed by this Court has been complied with. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted the compliance of the order passed by this Court. 4. As such, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) October 28, 2025 Radhika Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Purushottam Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Virendra Singh .....Applicant(s) Smt. Shadhna Srivastava, Director, Internal Accounts And Audit, Government Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad