Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17214 (GAU)

M/S NORTH EAST BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PVT LTD AND ANR v. IDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANR

WP(C)/5801/2022 · 2025-08-31

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010173542022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5801/2022 M/S NORTH EAST BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PVT LTD AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. NABIN CHANDRA BORAH, RESIDENT OF BELTOLA BAZAR, NEAR SONALI PATH, GUWAHATI- 781028, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. 2: NABIN CHANDRA BORAH S/O- LATE DEBEN CHANDRA BORAH RESIDENT OF BELTOLA BAZAR NEAR SONALI PATH GUWAHATI- 781028 KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM VERSUS IDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANR HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT IDBI TOWER, WTC COMPLEX, CUFFE PARADE, MUMBAI- 400005. 2:THE AUTHORISED OFFICER IDBI BANK LIMITED RETAIL RECOVERY CELL 6TH FLOOR IDBI BUILDING G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H BARUAH, MR B SAIKIA (p-2),MR. B BORGOHAIN (p- 2),MR. S NEOG (p-2),MS. S G BARUAH (p-2) Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A DHANUKA (R1, R2), MR. A GANGULY (R1, R2),MR. A DUTTA (R1, R2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 01.09.2025 Shri B. Borgohain, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. Also heard Shri A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant