PRAVESH KUMAR ALIAS PRAVESH PANWAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/15887/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172117 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172117 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15887 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents.
2. The case of the writ petitioner is that though the writ petitioner had been engaged as a home-guard but in the wake of certain complaints regarding his eligibility and suitability and inquiry was conducted to which a show cause notice was issued which stands replied by the writ petitioner but now he has not been allowed to perform the duties.
3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to allow the writ petitioner to perform the duties.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has produced the instructions dated 21.10.2025 according to which a decision would be taken within an appropriate period.
5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same.
6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the competent authority, who shall on the receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Shukla, Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pravesh Kumar Alias Pravesh Panwar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off.
9. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as Appendix-A. October 29, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15887 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad