Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172107 (ALL)

RAM CHANDRA MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NA529/3919/2025 · 2025-10-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3919 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is informant in Criminal Case No. 4388 of 2011 (State Vs. Radhey Mohan Yadav and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 215 of 2008, Under Sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 427 of I.P.C., at Police Station Sarpataha, District-Jaunpur pending before Judicial Magistrate 1", Jaunpur. It was further submitted that no witnesses till now on behalf of prosecution has been examined by trial Court. It was submitted by learned counsel for applicant that a direction be given to learned Trial Court to summon all the prosecution witnesses and to examine them. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the learned Magistrate to decide the said cases as expeditiously as expeditiously as possible. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the court below concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid cases as expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment. 4. The application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. is disposed of accordingly. October 27, 2025 Mukesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishikesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Ram Chandra Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad