Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172095 (ALL)

SATYANARAYAN AND 4 OTHERS v. NEELIMA VERMA

A227/12785/2025 · 2025-10-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12785 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed against the order dated 5.7.2025 by which ex parte interim injunction has been granted. 3. Against the order impugned, petitioners have alternative remedy of filing an objection under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C. as well as remedy of filing an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) C.P.C. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already moved an application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. 5. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the matter. 6. Since the application under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C. has already been filed on 21.7.2025, the same shall be considered and decided by the Court below, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 27, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Krishan Tripathi, Shishir Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Satyanarayan And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Neelima Verma .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad