HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13090 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " A. Pass an order directing to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mauranipur, District Jhansi to decide the 6C application in Original Suit No.-85/2025, Dharmendra and others versus Ajay and others as well as Original Suit No.-85/2025, Dharmendra and others versus Ajay and others, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mauranipur, District Jhansi." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mauranipur, District Jhansi to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 30, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar, Virendra Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Dharmendra .....Petitioner(s) Ajay And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad