[2025:RJ-JP:18345] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2543/2025 1. M/s Shubh All Ind Life Care, Through Pro. Parmanand Thakwani S/o Shri Moolchand Thakwani Aged 46 Years R/o House Number 2 Thha 27,sindhi Colony, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur Pin Code 302004. 2. Parmanand Thakwani S/o Shri Moolchand Thakwani, Aged About 46 Years, R/o House Number 2 Thha 27,sindhi Colony, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur Pin Code 302004. ----Petitioners Versus Dr Mahesh Singh Verma S/o Late Shri Mishri Lal Meena, R/o Bijalpur, Thana Kudganv, Tehsil And Distt Karouli Presen Flate Number 402, Banas Apartment Block -4 , Sector 26, Pratap Nagar Sanganer, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj Prasad For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 01/05/2025 On perusal of the order dated 04.04.2025, it is noted that application filed under Section 245 of the Cr.P.C., has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court for the reason that the same is filed at a premature stage. Nevertheless, the learned Trial Court has kept the point of law and facts open for discussion and consideration i.e. “whether petitioner was proprietor and signatory to the cheque or otherwise”. Relevant portion of the order dated 04.04.2025, is reproduced herein below:- "mHk; i{kks dks lquk tkdj izLrqr rdksZa ij fopkj&euu fd;k x;k rFkk i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA vfHk;qDr la- 2@izkFkhZ ijekuUn dh vksj ls Lo;a dks bl Lrj ij mUeksfpr djus [2025:RJ-JP:18345] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2543/2025] ds laca/k esa tks rdZ o rF; mDr izkFkZuk i= ds ek/;e ls U;k;ky; ds le{k is'k fd;s x;s gSa] os rF; o lk{; ds fefJr iz'u gSa ftuds lEcU/k esa gLrxr izdj.k esa fcuk lk{; vk;s] bl Lrj ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr ifjokn esa of.kZr vfHkopuksa ds laca/k esa] vfHk;qDr ifjoknh ls ftjg ds nkSjku ,oa viuh izfrj{kk esa cpko rdZ j[kus ds fy, Lora= gSA blds vfrfjDr lqlaxr fof/k ds voyksdu ls nf'kZr gksrk gS fd na-iz-la- dh /kkjk 245] eftLVªsV }kjk okjaV ekeyksa dh lquokbZ ds nkSjku] vfHk;qä dks cjh djus (discharge) ;k vkjksi eqä djus (acquittal) ds ckjs esa gS ijUrq gLrxr izdj.k ,d okjaV ekeyk ugha gS cfYd ,u-vkbZ- ,DV dh /kkjk 138] ds rgr ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr ij eqyfteku ds fo:) is'k ,d vkijkf/kd lEeu izdj.k gSA ,sls esa vfHk;qDr la- 2@izkFkhZ ijekuUn dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj fd;s tkuk mfpr o U;k;laxr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA vr% mDr izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA lk{; ifjoknh esa xokg ls ftjg gsrq vf/koDrk eqyfte us bl vk/kkj ij volj pkgk fd eqyfte dh vksj ls gLrxr i=koyh esa izFke ckj mifLFkr gq, gSa] vr% U;k;fgr esa xokg ls ftjg gsrq volj fn;k tkosA U;k;fgr esa volj bl fgnk;r ds lkFk fn;k tkrk gS fd vkxkeh is'kh ij xokg ls vko';d :i ls ftjg djsaA i=koyh okLrs lk{; ifjoknh fnukad 03-05-2025 dks is'k gksA" Considering the aforementioned, this Court is of the opinion that there is no apprehension of prejudice qua the petitioner due to the impugned order. This Court finds no reason to interfere with the present petition. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /32