Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17205 (KAR)

SRI GODFREY LOUIS FERNANDES v. MRS MARGARET JYOTHI FERNANDES

WP/37685/2017 · 2025-02-05

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5283 WP No. 37685 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 37685 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI GODFREY LOUIS FERNANDES, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O B.M.FERNANDES, NO.142, 6TH SQUARE, AUSTIN TOWN, BANGALORE-560 047. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.VASUDEVAN., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. MRS. MARGARET JYOTHI FERNANDES, 52 YEARS, W/O MR.GEORGE FERNANDES, DHUPE HOUSE NO.437, ASSAGO VILLAGE, BARDEZ, NORTH GOA-403 507. 2. MR. GEORGE FERNANDES S/O WALTER FERNANDES, DHUPE HOUSE NO.437, ASSAGO VILLAGE, BARDEZ, NORTH GOA-403 507. 3. MR. MARSHAL FERNANDES S/O GEORGE FERNANDES, NO.21, AMARAJYOTHI LAYOUT, INTERMEDIATE LINK ROAD, DOMULUR, BANGALORE-560 071. 4. MR. CHARLY DEVASIA THE FEDERAL BANK LTD, 97, VSR COMPLEX, OLD MADRAS ROAD, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5283 WP No. 37685 of 2017 KRISHNARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE-560 036. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.A.HUMAYUN., ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. B.S.JEEVAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen form the daily order sheet, petition was listed on 27.01.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 05.02.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5283 WP No. 37685 of 2017 is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3