HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15889 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri K.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Though the name of Sri Pranjal Mehrotra has been shown as counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, but he is not even present in the revised list, thus this Court has no option, but to proceeded in the matter. 3. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was issued a provisional offer letter, appointing the writ petitioner as Staff Nurse on 07.03.2024. The writ petitioner went for joining and she joined, but due to certain mishappening in the family, she could not attend the duties, pursuant whereto now she is not being allowed to join the duties. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that writ petitioner normally represented the matter before Respondent no.2, but no action has been taken. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that in case, the writ petitioner approaches Respondent no.2, then her claim shall be considered. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2 by 07.11.2025, who shall on the said motion proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Misra, Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Sangeeta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad