Raj Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others CWP No.7441 of 2024 26.03.2025 Present Mr. D.N.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Compliance affidavit is stated to have been filed, but the same is not on record. Registry to trace and place the same on record, if in order. Careful perusal of compliance affidavit, copy whereof has been made available to this Court by the respondents, reveals that in terms of the judgment dated 2.8.2024, respondents have decided the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 20.03.2025, wherein it has been held that petitioners, whose services have been regularized after 12th December, 2003 are not entitled for any benefit of seniority, increments and promotion etc. for the contract services rendered by them before regularization . Since only direction was to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner and in terms of afore judgment, representation of the petitioner has been already decided, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly same are closed. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to aforesaid order passed in purported compliance of the judgment. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge March 26,2025 (shankar)