Santosh Kumari Vs. State of H.P. and Others CWP No.7449 of 2024 08.04.2025 Present: Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Though compliance affidavit is stated to have been filed, but the same is not on record. Registry to trace and place the same on record, if in order. Careful perusal of compliance affidavit, which was made available by learned Additional Advocate General, during proceedings of the case, clearly reveals that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be complied with, respondent No.3 has granted the benefit of counting the contract service of the petitioner by issuing detailed order dated 27.03.2025, which was passed in continuation of previous order dated 11.12.2024. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same are closed. April 08, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge