Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172007 (MAD)

AKASH v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/27973/2025 · 2025-10-14

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 27973 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 27973 of 2025 1. AKASH 2. Franklin Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thiruvallur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. Crime No.259 of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Cr.No.259 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police pending on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 27973 of 2025 ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.08.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 118(1), 126(2), 296(b), 309(4) of BNS Act, in Crime No.259 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2. This is the second bail application. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners joined hands with other accused and waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.1050/- from him at knife point and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 27973 of 2025 the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioners, reiterated the prosecution case and states that the first petitioner has fifteen previous cases and the second petitioner has four previous cases. 5.Considering the facts, gravity of offence and the bad antecedent of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and there is no change in circumstances of the case. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 14-10-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 27973 of 2025 To 1.The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thiruvallur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. Crime No.259 of 2025 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 27973 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 27973 of 2025 14-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis