[2025:RJ-JP:13460] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9525/2012 Ms V Prabha w/o Vishnu Datt Sharma aged 81 years, Land Lady and Resident of O,16 Durga marg, “C” Scheme, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Navsrajit Rent Tribunal, District Court Compound, Bani Park, Jaipur 2. Shri Rajesh Sharma, S/O Shri OL Sharma, aged 40 years, Resident of House, No. B-56 Saket Colony, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur and Tenant of office Room no. C-1, Main Kothi Iind Floor, “Saket Parisar” Plot No. O,16 Durga Marg,“C” Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9523/2012 Ms V Prabha w/o Vishnu Datt Sharma aged 81 years, Land Lady and Resident of O,16 Durga marg, “C” Scheme, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Navsrajit Rent Tribunal, District Court Compound, Bani Park, Jaipur 2. Smt. Suman Kedawat w/o Virendra Kedawat, aged nearly 35 years, Resident of House No. 26 Madhuban Colony, Kisan Marg, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Tenant of Flat No. D-3 and Shop A-1, "Saket Parisar" Plot No. O-16, Durga Marg, "C" Scheme, Jaipur 3. Smt. Vinita Sharma W/o. Rajesh Sharma aged nearly 36 years Resident of a House No. B-56, Saket Colony, Adarsh Na- gar, Nagar Jaipur, Joint Tenant, of Flat No. D-3 and Shop A-1, "Saket Parisar" Plot No. O-16, Durga Marg, "C" Scheme, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K. Daga Mr. Rahal Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order [2025:RJ-JP:13460] (2 of 2) [CW-9525/2012] 24/03/2025 1. Order under challenge in both the writ petitions is of dated 16.05.2012 passed in Original Application No.239/2011 by the newly constituted Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, de- clining to take rejoinder of petitioner on record and rejecting her prayer of cross-examining the respondent No.2 in the proceedings under Sections 6/7 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 seek- ing for revision of rent. 2. It appears that during course of writ petition, sole petitioner passed away, hence, application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC was moved by the legal representatives of deceased petitioner on 07.12.2020 which is pending. 3. As per status report dated 24.03.2025, received from the Rent Tribunal the proceedings of original application have been fi- nally decided on 20.11.2024. 4. Hence, in that view, challenge to interlocutory orders in both writ petitions has rendered infructuous. 5. Accordingly, both writ petitions stands disposed of. Since pe- titions have rendered infructuous, application(1/2020) is also dis- posed of. 6. Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /242-243