Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1720 (AP)

M/S. Sri Sai Constructions v. SACHIDANANDA VARMA

CC/3305/2025 · 2026-04-23

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HN, J C.C.No.3305_2025 APHC010582232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3305/2025 Between: 1. M/S. SRI SAI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER, D. RAM PRASAD S/O.NARASIMHA MURTHI, AGE 47 YEARS ,D.NO.2-277,ANJANEYA NAGAR, RAMAYAPETA (V), KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SACHIDANANDA VARMA, COMMISSIONER KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 2. SRI S MASTYARAJU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 20.08.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No.21967/2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased HN, J C.C.No.3305_2025 may be pleased to Amend the Cause Title in the present Contempt case by Deleting the Respondent No.1 Sri S Sachidananda Varma ( S S Varma), Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District and Amend Respondent 1 as Sri N V V Satyanarayana, Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada in the above C.C.No.3305 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2. ABHISHEK NAIDU AKKENA HN, J C.C.No.3305_2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:24.04.2026 NKA HN, J C.C.No.3305_2025 254 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3305 of 2025 Date: 24.04.2026 NKA