SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.3746 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent no.1. 3. Mr. K.S. Mehta, Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Nailwal and Mr. Devendra Pant, S.C. for the State/respondent nos.2 to 5. 4. This writ petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- “a. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing the Order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Ld Assistant Collector First Class in Revenue Case no.22/01 of 2025-26 Shambhu Nath VS Bhupinder and others being voilative of law. (Annexure-7 to this writ petition) and/or in alternative the authorities be directed to first decide the question of maintainability of the Revenue Case no.22 of 2025-26 Shambhu Nath Vs Bhupinder and other. in alternative the authorities be directed to first decide the question of maintainability of the Revenue Case no. 22 of 2025-26 Shambhu Nath Vs Bhupinder and other. b. Any other writ, order or direction, allowing such consequential reliefs, or pass any interim / ad-interim order / allow further reliefs, as expedient in law, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. In a nutshell, counsel for the petitioner wants this Court to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to dismiss a revenue suit which has been filed by respondent no.1/plaintiff in the court of learned Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1901. 6. The ground which has been canvassed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent 2 no.1/plaintiff lost before in all nine different forums while claiming right with respect to the land subject matter of the revenue suit and therefore this present suit under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1901, be dismissed at the threshold. 7. Such a prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is totally misconceived and cannot be entertained. 8. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed at the threshold. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.01.2026 SK