Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171955 (ALL)

DEEPAK URF DEEPAK CHAUDHARY AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/13914/2024 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13914 of 2024 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Hemendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Shitesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri T.K.Chauhan, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of S.T. No. 42 of 2018 (State Vs. Gaurav and others), under Sections 307, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station Sikandarabad, District Bulandshahr as well as summoning order dated 03.10.2022 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 7, Bulandshahr. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants state that an order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 11.06.2024 directing the applicants to file the said compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the court concerned on 18.07.2024 verified the said compromise. Copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 4. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Mayank, Abhishek Srivastava, Hemendra Pratap Singh, Shashikala Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Urf Deepak Chaudhary And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 5. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings, charge sheet as well as cognizance order as prayed for by the applicant(s). 6. The present application is allowed. 7. The entire proceedings, charge sheet as well as cognizance order of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. October 28, 2025 PS A482 No. 13914 of 2024 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad