SMT URMILA YADAV v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/23901/2025 · 2025-10-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23901 of 2025 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J.
1. Upon being informed by learned AGA that a charge sheet has been forwarded in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as may be available under law.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. October 28, 2025 Rama Kant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Indra Jeet Yadav, Sharad Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sanjay Kumar Yadav (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Smt Urmila Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad