VINOD KUMAR AND ORS v. STATE MEDICAL AND HEALTH DEPORS
CW/8778/2012 · 2025-02-04
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17193 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17193 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8778/2012
1. Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Amba Lal aged about 28 years resident of Kulmipura, Pratapgarh (Raj.) posted as Patient Counselor at Distt. Hospital, Pratapgarh (Raj)
2. Pooja Anil Paliwal W/o Shri Anil Paliwal aged about 32 years resident of 13, Ghaneram Ki Ghati, Opp. Jagdish Mandir, Udaipur (Raj.) 3 Tinkal Chugh S/o Shri Dalip Kumar aged about 25 years resident of Ward No. 13, Shri Balaji Niwas, Dhuriya Chowck, Anupgarh, Distt. Sriganganagar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Medical & Health, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan
2. The Director, Medical & Health, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur
3. The Mission Director, National Rural Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur
4. The Project Director, Rajasthan Health System Development Project, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur
5. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, Pratapgarh
6. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, Udaipur
7. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, Sriganganagar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prithvi Pal for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra-AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/02/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing a direction to the respondents to transfer the service of the petitioners from RHSDP to NRHM.
(2 of 2) [CW-8778/2012]
2. At the outset, counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that the scheme of RHSDP was closed long back in the year 2011 itself, hence the relief sought in this petition cannot be granted to the petitioners.
3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that the scheme with regard to RHSDP was closed way back in the year 2011 itself, hence the petitioners are not entitled to get any relief at this belated stage.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed.
5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/118