Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17192 (RAJ)

ROSHAN KUMAR SON OF PAPPU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5677/2025 · 2025-05-30

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22779] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5677/2025 Roshan Kumar Son Of Pappu, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Jonka, Post Karma, Police Station Taljhari, District Dumka, Jharkhand, At Present Jhajjar Gate Faruknagar, Gurgaon ( Haryana) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.1/2024 registered at Police Station- Cyber Police Thana (Baran), District-Baran for the offences under Section 420 IPC and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that as per the charge-sheet, the prime accused is Rakesh Kumar. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he has transferred the so called amount to co-accused-Prince and Sonu. Co-accused-Prince and Sonu have been enlarged on bail by [2025:RJ-JP:22779] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5677/2025] Coordinate Bench of this Court. The case of present petitioner Roshan Kumar is akin to that of Prince and Sonu. Petitioner is behind the bars since 29.09.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed. Therefore, on the ground of parity, the petitioner may be released on bail. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Roshan Kumar Son Of Pappu shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/280