HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2838 of 2025 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri K.C. Mishra, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for respondent no. 3-Gaon Sabha. 2. Instructions sent by the member of Board of Revenue are already on the record of the writ-petition. 3. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "A- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to respondent no. 2 to decide the revision bearing no. 800 of 2023 Computerize No. AL-2023024200800 Kesh Pal and Another Vs. Harivilas and others Under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a very stipulated time as per fixed by this Hon'ble Court. B- Or may issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the fact and circumstances of the present case otherwise; petitioners shall have to sustain an irreparable loss and injury which cannot be compensate in any manner. C- Award the cost of petition in favour of the petitioners." 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed on behalf of petitioner arising out of proceeding under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no. 2-Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj. He Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : K.C. Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Kesh Pal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 37 Others .....Respondent(s) further submitted that substitution applications are also pending in the aforementioned revision, as such appropriate direction be issued for expeditious disposal of pending revision, after deciding the pending substitution application in the revision. 5. I have considered the argument advanced by the learned counsel for petitioner and perused the record. 6. There is no dispute about the fact that revision filed by petitioner under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as substitution application filed in the pending revision are pending. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is finally disposed of directing the respondent no. 2-Board of Revenue, U.P. Prayagraj to decide the aforementioned revision, considering the pending substitution application in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. October 27, 2025 Neetu WRIB No. 2838 of 2025 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- NEETU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad