Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17191 (AP)

SHOBA RANI NUTHALAPATI @ DASARI UMA DEVI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11998/2024 · 2025-08-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010234042024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 11998/2024 Between: 1. SHOBA RANI NUTHALAPATI @ DASARI UMA DEVI, W/O LATE ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, C/O B.NAGA CHANDRA SEKHAR, FLAT NO.302, SAI DWARAKA GIRIDHAM, S.V.N.COLONY, 6TH LANE, BACK SIDE VENKATESWARA TEMPLE, VTC, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNUR POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNUR POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SRI KOTHAPALLI LAKSHMANA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF D.NO.9- 8-51, KONDAMUDI ROAD, NIDUBROLU, PONNUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. SRI DASARI GANESH BABU, S/O LATE VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.9-15-5/ 1, NIDUBROLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. SRI DASARI YUGANDHAR, S/O GANESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.9-15-5/1, NIDUBROLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. SRI DASARI JAGADEESH, S/O GANESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC-AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.9-15-5/1, NIDUBROLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in not providing police protection to the petitioner against her representation dated 15-04-2024 in view of the Decree and Judgment passed in Suit O.S.No.29 of 2024, dated 21-03-2024 on the file of the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur, Guntur District is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and also violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to provide police protection to the petitioner and pass such pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in not providing police protection to the petitioner against her representation dated 15-04-2024 in view of the Decree and Judgment passed in Suit O.S.No.29 of 2024, dated 21-03-2024 on the file of the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur, Guntur District is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and also violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to provide police protection to the petitioner and pass such pass ....” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police on instructions would submit that no representation is received from the Petitioner as alleged in the Writ Petition and that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Police in case the threat is continued against her. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Police in case threat is continued against her. On such representation, Police are directed to look into the matter and take an appropriate decision over the matter according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 11998 of 2024 19.08.2025 Mjl /*